I posted a response in the other forum regarding the Fitch (the big one) on this site, I'm waiting for it to get posted so I won't go into a the same discussion here. However, I did want to comment on the issue of being a 'proper scientific' testing. I realize I am new here and at the risk of getting booted off before I get one post in, I do believe this brand of testing has already been done. It would appear to me that how ever many tests are done there will still be skeptics who without even trying something will argue to the death that a thing just can't be because it just can't.

If you go read my post (if it gets posted), I have provided, in my opinion, sufficient proof that the product works (exceptionally well) for what it was designed for and that is to restore fuel to a fresher state and keep it fresh. I think you can all agree that fresh fuel is better in every way then stale fuel so logic would dictate that the Fitch, providing fresher fuel, would allow for a better combustion process.

So, with regard to testing, the more stale the fuel in the baseline the better the results will be once the Fitch has been allowed to treat the same stale fuel sample. If you need some stale fuel let me know, there are over 35 communities in the North with storage tanks full of it.

As for Mythbusters, I am trying to get them to do a show specifically on the Fitch as their other shows on this topic did not include this product.

claudemc