Ok I have some questions I might ask in here. It relates to both Ethanol and Bio.
In Sydney at the moment he big new days discussion on Radio Talk Back like 2GB is all about ethanol.
Out of 50 calls 1 is about Bio.
Why does ethanol get so much support and publicity and Bio gets virtually zero?
My theory on the matter is that the big Oil giants know that their days are somewhat numbered in an intelligent and informed country as Aus, they run through a campaign everytime someone mentions Bio and say that it destroys engines and is bad but Ethanol is OK.
Now the theory behind this is that Ethanol will in the medium to longer term in Aus only ever be an additive so it will never replace the fuel that people run in their cars.
But on the side of Bio it can and likely will in the shorter term replace all the dinodiesel used in the transport industry.
I can never fully understand the reasons behind this move and why Bio gets so little news time compaired to it's little brother Ethanol.
Any one got any ideas?
In Sydney at the moment he big new days discussion on Radio Talk Back like 2GB is all about ethanol.
Out of 50 calls 1 is about Bio.
Why does ethanol get so much support and publicity and Bio gets virtually zero?
My theory on the matter is that the big Oil giants know that their days are somewhat numbered in an intelligent and informed country as Aus, they run through a campaign everytime someone mentions Bio and say that it destroys engines and is bad but Ethanol is OK.
Now the theory behind this is that Ethanol will in the medium to longer term in Aus only ever be an additive so it will never replace the fuel that people run in their cars.
But on the side of Bio it can and likely will in the shorter term replace all the dinodiesel used in the transport industry.
I can never fully understand the reasons behind this move and why Bio gets so little news time compaired to it's little brother Ethanol.
Any one got any ideas?
Comment